During the proceedings, Advocate Shadan Farasat, representing Chadha, highlighted the urgency of the matter, suggesting a listing on November 29 due to the impending deadline for Winter Session questions. However, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud advised patience, stating, "Sometimes it is better to stay calm and read between the lines." The bench ultimately scheduled the next hearing for December 1.

Previously, on November 3, the Supreme Court had directed Chadha to apologize unconditionally to Rajya Sabha chairperson Jagdeep Dhankhar over a select committee row. The court suggested a sympathetic consideration of the apology. The suspension of Chadha dates back to August 11, following allegations by some MPs, mainly from the BJP, that he added their names to a motion without consent. The motion sought the formation of a select committee to examine the Delhi Services Bill.

The court, led by CJI Chandrachud, expressed concerns about the serious repercussions of indefinite suspension on people's right to representation. It questioned whether the Privileges Committee could order such suspension for an unspecified duration. Chadha's plea argued that indefinite suspension is prone to abuse, emphasizing that it goes against Rule 256 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States.

In response, the court had noted that the only charge against Chadha was not seeking permission from some MPs before including them in the proposed select committee. The AAP leader's plea emphasized that the power to suspend should be a shield, not a sword, and should not be used punitively. The Rajya Sabha had passed a motion seeking action against Chadha on August 11, leading to his suspension pending a Privileges Committee report.