80timeph.Timeph philippines,Timeph philippines

National

SC Voices Displeasure Over States Not Filing Affidavit On Time, Says Getting Pleadings Completed A "Herculean Task"

Taking exception to the fact that some states did not file counter affidavits on time for a petition calling for enacting well-defined laws/rules to ensure the Constitution's fundamental duties were adhered to, the Supreme Court expressed its displeasure on Tuesday.

SC Voices Displeasure Over States Not Filing Affidavit On Time, Says Getting Pleadings Completed A "Herculean Task"
info_icon

The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed displeasure over some states not filing counter affidavits on time on a petition seeking directions for enacting well-defined laws/rules to ensure adherence to the fundamental duties as enshrined in the Constitution, and said getting the pleadings completed is a "herculean task".
?? ?
A bench headed by Justice S K Kaul observed that affidavits are being filed just a day before the scheduled hearing in the matter.
?? ?
"Getting the pleadings completed is a herculean task," the bench, also comprising Justices Manoj Misra and Aravind Kumar, said while asking why cannot the affidavits be filed on time in advance.
?? ?
The bench was informed that as per the official report of the apex court in the matter, some states have not filed their counter affidavits.?? ?
?? ??
The top court referred to the official report and noted it showed some states have not filed the counter affidavit or filed it belatedly.?
?? ?
While posting the matter for further hearing on March 28, the bench said the secretary of the ministry concerned with states that still do not file the counter affidavit, will have to remain present before it through virtual mode.
?? ?
While hearing the matter in November last year, the apex court had given one last opportunity to the states to file their affidavits within four weeks.?
?? ?
"The failure to file an affidavit within the specified time (whether filed or not) will result in costs of Rs 25,000 each," the bench had said in its order.
?? ?
Earlier in July last year, the apex court had granted two more months to the Centre to file its response to the plea.
?? ?
The top court was hearing a plea filed by an advocate seeking the issuance of directives to ensure adherence to the mandates as postulated under Part IV-A of the Constitution.
?? ?
The plea has said the fundamental duties are intended to serve as a constant reminder to every citizen that while the Constitution conferred on them certain fundamental rights specifically, it also requires citizens to observe certain basic norms of democratic conduct and behaviour because rights and duties are correlative.?
?? ?
The plea said it aims to address the issue of national importance and to promote commitment amongst citizens towards each other and the nation as these contribute to the development and progress of the nation.